I wanted to quote extensively from this article by Phd student Geof Glass about the impending changes to Canadian copyright law and the ways they will affect our lives as creators and sharers and digital transmogrifyiers and private citizens. The laws proposed will go even further then American laws to restrict even educational rights, and we have a limited amount of time to make our views known, so get in there friends!
URL for Public Consultation: http://copyright.econsultation.ca/
Canada is about to reform its copyright law. Our government is holding a public consultation, and we need to be involved.
Big media companies are pushing hard to make more activity illegal and to institute extraordinarily harsh penalties. They want your Internet provider to spy on your private communications to make sure you aren’t sharing anything you shouldn’t. They want to terminate your Internet access on the basis of mere accusations of infringement—with no need to prove you did anything wrong. They want to outlaw DVD players capable of playing legally purchased movies from Asia, Europe, or South America. They would allow teachers to critique popular culture without asking for permission—but then force them to destroy the lesson materials, and ensure that all students’ copies are also destroyed.
(…)
An American woman was recently fined $1.9 million for sharing 24 of her favourite songs on-line. The response of the Department of Justice? That the judgement was not “disproportionate to the offense”. Bankers who have cost the economy trillions receive bonuses, while file-sharers are driven to bankruptcy. U.S. copyright law has suffered regulatory capture by media and technology behemoths. The U.S. in turn has threatened Canada with non-cooperation on trade unless we follow its lead on copyright.
Many of these measures were proposed in Bill C-61, introduced in Parliament last year. When Canadians found out what was happening, tens of thousands wrote to their MPs. Appropriation Art, an artists’ group, described the bill as “censorship”. Documentary filmmakers said that the law would block them from commenting on aspects of our politics and culture. Hundreds of Canadian musicians, who had already broken with the American-led Canadian Recording Industry Association over this issue, responded that they saw nothing in this bill for them.
Following the unexpected resistance to C-61, the Canadian government decided to ask Canadians what kind of copyright we want. Until September 13, the government is holding public consultations about what should be in the new law.
(…)
All the evidence from around the world is that draconian copyright laws do not work. They fail to stop freeloaders. But they are devastatingly effective at restricting artists and innovators—because they operate in the public eye. People see this. When they see copyright blocking the creativity it is supposed to promote, they lose respect for the law. For copyright law to be effective, it must be respected. To be respected, it must be fair.
Geof Glass: How Canada’s new copyright law will affect you
Check out: faircopy.ca/
Just to be clear: these are not current government proposals. There are lobbyists pushing for the measures I describe (and more). This is why it is so important to participate in the consultation now.
Posted on August 19th, 2009 at 2:19 am [permalink]
Thanks for the clarification Geoff and for a great article.
Posted on August 19th, 2009 at 8:08 am [permalink]